Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 4:26:23 GMT -5
Which citizens seem to find themselves identified with the political, economic, social and cultural world in which they live and times, on the other hand, in which they feel disoriented and abandoned, as if they found themselves "at the "outbreak of loneliness: they fail to understand politicians." This crisis of loneliness and insecurity is even more accentuated, if possible, when there has been too much trust, without reason, in the institutions and those who represent them. Three examples?: one: the loss of confidence of many Spaniards in “the king emeritus” after the disenchantment with his extravagant and unethical adventures, he was an admired character who today disappoints; two: the permanent noise that is seen and heard in Parliament that, instead of sensible oratory to reach agreements, vulgar insults and confrontation take precedence, and three: the low human worth of certain representatives of the judiciary.
perhaps very learned but very ideologically cornered. Martin Buber, Austrian Jewish philosopher and writer, in addition to his peculiar capacity as a great thinker for science and known for his philosophy of dialogue, knew how to perfectly master the secrets of language. Convinced that the ice of lack of Australia Phone Number communication greatly affected the society of his time, the deep interest of his philosophical reflection had a very precise objective: to awaken in the citizen man the desire for an increasingly human life and to transmit the message that personal happiness can only be achieved through conscious and voluntary integration in the communicative relationship, “the self” is only understood when you accept that there is “a you.” True life is found in the meeting of subjects; I find that it is direct and in which no system of competing ideas, but rather dialogued ones, intervenes between the I and the you .
He was convinced that someone is a person to the extent that he coexists with and includes others in the community. “One is more “I,” he stated , to the extent that he accepts the identity of “others . ” It is necessary to erase the limits that foster distance between groups, circles and parties and recognize and test the responsibility of a life in community. He opposed both individualism, in which no one cares about the other, and collectivism, in which ideas are imposed on others: he wanted life in the community. The primary thing is the relationship; Although reality is not always so romantic nor is the acceptance of others serene, often, Buber said, blinding indifference or hatred arises. His thinking always trusted that dialogue is always possible with others, with other people and other nations; He even became a “spokesperson” for possible Arab-Israeli friendship, a point that was not accepted within the Jewish people.
perhaps very learned but very ideologically cornered. Martin Buber, Austrian Jewish philosopher and writer, in addition to his peculiar capacity as a great thinker for science and known for his philosophy of dialogue, knew how to perfectly master the secrets of language. Convinced that the ice of lack of Australia Phone Number communication greatly affected the society of his time, the deep interest of his philosophical reflection had a very precise objective: to awaken in the citizen man the desire for an increasingly human life and to transmit the message that personal happiness can only be achieved through conscious and voluntary integration in the communicative relationship, “the self” is only understood when you accept that there is “a you.” True life is found in the meeting of subjects; I find that it is direct and in which no system of competing ideas, but rather dialogued ones, intervenes between the I and the you .
He was convinced that someone is a person to the extent that he coexists with and includes others in the community. “One is more “I,” he stated , to the extent that he accepts the identity of “others . ” It is necessary to erase the limits that foster distance between groups, circles and parties and recognize and test the responsibility of a life in community. He opposed both individualism, in which no one cares about the other, and collectivism, in which ideas are imposed on others: he wanted life in the community. The primary thing is the relationship; Although reality is not always so romantic nor is the acceptance of others serene, often, Buber said, blinding indifference or hatred arises. His thinking always trusted that dialogue is always possible with others, with other people and other nations; He even became a “spokesperson” for possible Arab-Israeli friendship, a point that was not accepted within the Jewish people.
