Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 0:49:24 GMT -5
Reason for the disagreement with what was agreed, with the demands of ERC and PNV? The reason is not labor, nor union, nor economic, it is partisan. gabriel rufian Gabriel Rufián, ERC spokesperson in Congress. Quim González Muntadas QUIM need your help to continue reporting Become a member of Nuevatribuna After long months of negotiation, tug-of-war, between the government, employers and unions to reach an agreement for the Labor Reform, serious difficulties now arise for its approval in the Congress of Deputies. Some, who logically should support it and vote in favor because they have agreed with the criticism of the Popular Party's labor policy and have demanded changes in the current labor market, now tell us that they will vote against if it is not accepted. their amendments to the agreement reached through tripartite social dialogue.
Want an exclusively Basque and Catalan labor relations framework What does your position respond to? Is it because they underestimate the weight of an agreement resulting from social Malta Phone Number dialogue and agreements between social agents and the government? No, far from it, because when they, from the Government of Catalonia or Euskadi, reach an agreement in their area, even when it is nothing more than a declaration of intentions (as happens on more than one occasion), they highlight its merit and value, making them a momentous political success and an example of his “positive style of government.” So, where is the reason for the disagreement with what was agreed, with the demands of ERC and PNV? The reason is not labor, nor union, nor economic.
Partisan, this is a good opportunity that they want to take advantage of to put one more brick in the wall, in the division and separation of Euskadi and Catalonia with the other towns and territories of Spain in logic with their respective nationalist projects. Therefore, their condition, they say sine qua non, is to be able to protect by law that the state sector agreements are not applicable, nor can they be articulated with the autonomous agreements, in Catalonia and Euskadi. Very coherent with their “Autonomous Labor Relations Framework” project, or put more clearly so that it is understood: they want an exclusively Basque and Catalan labor relations framework.
Want an exclusively Basque and Catalan labor relations framework What does your position respond to? Is it because they underestimate the weight of an agreement resulting from social Malta Phone Number dialogue and agreements between social agents and the government? No, far from it, because when they, from the Government of Catalonia or Euskadi, reach an agreement in their area, even when it is nothing more than a declaration of intentions (as happens on more than one occasion), they highlight its merit and value, making them a momentous political success and an example of his “positive style of government.” So, where is the reason for the disagreement with what was agreed, with the demands of ERC and PNV? The reason is not labor, nor union, nor economic.
Partisan, this is a good opportunity that they want to take advantage of to put one more brick in the wall, in the division and separation of Euskadi and Catalonia with the other towns and territories of Spain in logic with their respective nationalist projects. Therefore, their condition, they say sine qua non, is to be able to protect by law that the state sector agreements are not applicable, nor can they be articulated with the autonomous agreements, in Catalonia and Euskadi. Very coherent with their “Autonomous Labor Relations Framework” project, or put more clearly so that it is understood: they want an exclusively Basque and Catalan labor relations framework.
